Our partnerships make our work possible. The State LGBT+ Business Climate Index is financially supported by a grant from the Gill Foundation. The Index is based on data graciously shared by the Movement Advancement Project and the Williams Institute. Ropes & Gray is our pro bono legal partner for the CEO Business Briefs globally, and their research informs this Index. FCB partnered with us to conduct original market research into American attitudes toward LGBT+ workplace inclusion, informing the Regional Context section of the State CEO Briefs. America Competes supported the development of the scoring for the Risk Assessments detailed below, particularly for the Future Risk score.

Out Leadership and FCB partnered on original market research into the attitudes of American workers on LGBT+ inclusion, which fielded in March and April 2019. The full results will be launched in September 2019; we are able to share preliminary regional comparisons in this brief.

LGBT+ workers in the Southeast are the most likely to be out at work (54.4%), but they are also 25% more likely to feel that covering behaviors are important for workplace success. More broadly, non-LGBT+ workers in this region preferred for businesses to demonstrate their support for the LGBT+ community using internal initiatives (like hiring more LGBT employees and creating more inclusive HR policies). However, this group was 57% less likely to approve of more public demonstrations of support (like withdrawing sponsorship from sporting events in less inclusive areas). LGBT+ workers in this region are 39% more likely to support inclusive businesses and 17% more likely to consider LGBT+ friendliness in making spending decisions compared to the non-LGBT workers nationwide. However, there is a perception that state leadership speaks about the LGBT+ community in a more negative way (39% more likely than nationwide), which could partially explain why the LGBT workers in the Southeast are 19% more likely to say that they would be open to moving to a state with better LGBT+ support.

Unless otherwise noted, all comparisons for more or less likely are compared to the National results.  Regional results are based off of 1,500 respondents (LGBT+ and Non-LGBT+ responses have been weighted to be age-representative for each audience in each region).  National results are based off of 600 respondents representative of each audience (LGBT+ vs Non-LGBT+).

States in the Southeast region included: Alabama, Arkansas, Kentucky, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia.

Legal status of the Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual Community

• – Florida does not have statewide nondiscrimination laws on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity, though some protections have been passed at the local level. The state also lacks statewide laws or a Governor’s executive order protecting state employees from discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. One Cabinet officer, Commissioner of Agriculture Nikki Fried, has updated personnel policies to include sexual orientation and gender identity protections.
• – There are no explicit prohibitions against second-parent adoptions in the state of Florida. However, second-parent adoption is more complex and expensive than step-parent adoption, as it requires a home study and additional paperwork.
• – In Florida it is a third-degree felony punishable by up to five years in prison and/or a $5,000 fine for an HIV+ person to have sexual intercourse without disclosing their status (given that they are aware of their HIV+ status and have been informed that it sexually transmittable). A failure to disclose HIV+ status on multiple occasions is a first-degree felony punishable by up to 30 years imprisonment.
• – Sexual orientation has been included in Florida’s hate crimes law since 1991.
• – The state legislature routinely considers “preemption” bills that would prevent municipalities from making and enforcing some laws, including LGBT+ protections, if there’s a state law on the books addressing it. At least one bill, proposed in 2018, intentionally targeted LGBT+ protections, but a number of other bills have unintentionally threatened LGBT+ protections.
• – A 2018 Williams Institute survey in northeastern Florida reported that three quarters of LGBT+ respondents experienced discrimination in their everyday life.

Legal status of the Transgender Community

• – In December 2011, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that it is a violation of the U.S. Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause’s prohibition of sex-based discrimination for a government agent to fire a transgender employee because of their gender non-conformity in Glenn v Brumby.
• – Florida administrative rules include protections against discrimination in the child welfare system on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity and the laws require LGBT+ competency training for staff working with children.
• – Individuals in Florida can amend their legal gender on their birth certificate and driver’s license. For birth certificates, individuals must submit an application and affidavit, a signed letter from a physician confirming appropriate clinical treatment for gender transition, and payment of the amendment fee. For a driver’s license, individuals must submit a court order for the change and/or a signed letter from a physician confirming appropriate clinical treatment for gender transition. Gender confirmation surgery is not required.
• – Gender identity is not currently included in the state’s hate crimes protections. Legislation was introduced in 2019 to include gender identity, but was never given a hearing.
• – A federal judge in Florida ruled in 2018 that a transgender woman incarcerated in the state, Reiyn Keohane, must be permitted to dress and groom herself in accordance with her gender identity.
• – Florida does not have any explicit State Medicaid policy regarding transgender healthcare coverage, and no laws banning transgender healthcare exclusions by insurers. The state also lacks insurance nondiscrimination protections for gender identity and sexual orientation.

Government statements and actions

• – In the 2019 legislative session, the proposed budget allocated $500,000 toward a memorial for the Pulse massacre in Orlando. The budget awaits signature by Governor Ron DeSantis.
• – In one of his first acts as Governor, Ron DeSantis signed a nondiscrimination order for state employees that failed to include protections on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. DeSantis holds a 0 rating from the Human Rights Campaign based on his voting record on LGBT+ issues in Congress.
• – In the wake of the 2016 Pulse massacre, then Governor Rick Scott, now the state’s junior senator, promised leaders of Equality Florida that he would take action on an Executive Order extending protections to LGBT+ state workers, but never did so.
• – Orlando City Council announced the approval of a memorial for the Pulse Nightclub shooting victims in March 2019 at a local cemetery. The 2016 shooting is the deadliest crime against LGBT+ people in U.S. history.
• – Senator Marco Rubio has said that “you have to really have a ridiculous and absurd reading of the U.S. constitution to reach the conclusion that people have a right to marry someone of the same sex.”
• – Rubio has also said that “the most important thing the next President will do is appoint Supreme Court justices” opposed to rulings like Obergefell v Hodges, and has suggested that Supreme Court appointments are the best way to reverse the historic ruling and roll back progress.