Our partnerships make our work possible. The State LGBT+ Business Climate Index is financially supported by a grant from the Gill Foundation. The Index is based on data graciously shared by the Movement Advancement Project and the Williams Institute. Ropes & Gray is our pro bono legal partner for the CEO Business Briefs globally, and their research informs this Index. FCB partnered with us to conduct original market research into American attitudes toward LGBT+ workplace inclusion, informing the Regional Context section of the State CEO Briefs. America Competes supported the development of the scoring for the Risk Assessments detailed below, particularly for the Future Risk score.

Out Leadership and FCB partnered on original market research into the attitudes of American workers on LGBT+ inclusion, which fielded in March and April 2019. The full results will be launched in the Spring of 2020; we are able to share preliminary regional comparisons in this brief.

LGBT+ workers in the Southeast are the most likely to be out at work (54.4%), but they are also 25% more likely to feel that covering behaviors are important for workplace success. More broadly, non LGBT+ workers in this region preferred for businesses to demonstrate their support for the LGBT+ community using internal initiatives (like hiring more LGBT employees and creating more inclusive HR policies). However, this group was 57% less likely to approve of more public demonstrations of support (like withdrawing sponsorship from sporting events in less inclusive areas). LGBT+ workers in this region are 39% more likely to support inclusive businesses and 17% more likely to consider LGBT+ friendliness in making spending decisions compared to the non-LGBT workers nationwide. However, there is a perception that state leadership speaks about the LGBT+ community in a more negative way (39% more likely than nationwide), which could partially explain why LGBT+ workers in the Southeast are 19% more likely to say that they would be open to moving to a state with better LGBT+ support.

Unless otherwise noted, all comparisons for more or less likely are compared to the National results. Regional results are based off of 1,500 respondents (LGBT+ and Non-LGBT+ responses have been weighted to be age-representative for each audience in each region). National results are based off of 600 respondents representative of each audience (LGBT+ vs Non-LGBT+).

States in the Southeast region included: Alabama, Arkansas, Kentucky, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia.

Legal status of the Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual Community

Arkansas law does not offer discrimination protections based on gender identity or sexual orientation in housing, employment, public accommodation, or education. State law currently prohibits local governments from passing protections.

The capital city of Little Rock and several other cities, including Conway, Hot Springs, and North Little Rock, prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity in public employment. The city of Eureka Springs prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity in both public and private employment, housing, and public accommodations.

Arkansas voters passed Arkansas Proposed Initiative Act No. 1 in 2008 to prohibit individuals living together outside a legal marriage from adopting or providing foster care to minors. The measure was proposed primarily to prohibit same-sex couples from being adoptive or foster parents. In 2010, the law was found unconstitutional, a ruling upheld unanimously by the Arkansas Supreme Court in 2011.

The Arkansas Supreme Court in 2006 also struck down a state regulation banning LGBTQ people and households where any LGBTQ adult resided from foster parenting.

Arkansas does not have a hate crime law that attaches penalties to criminal convictions when motivated by gender identity or sexual orientation.

Arkansas has no restrictions on conversion therapy.

Arkansas considers people living with HIV to be a danger to the public when they have sex or donate blood without disclosing their status. A person living with HIV or AIDS who engages in either of these acts without knowing their status are criminally liable regardless and may be charged with a Class A felony. Neither the intent to transmit HIV nor transmission of HIV is required for prosecution. Conviction can result in a sentence of six to 30 years’ imprisonment and a fine of up to $15,000. Additionally, people convicted of engaging in sexual conduct without disclosing their status could end up being required to register as a sex offender.

All people living with HIV in Arkansas who know their HIV status must inform doctors or dentists of their HIV status before receiving treatment. Failure to meet this requirement is a Class A misdemeanor punishable by up to one year in prison, a $2,500 fine, or both.

Legal status of the Transgender Community

Gender marker changes on birth certificates require submitting an affidavit to the Circuit Court with a physician attesting to gender affirmation surgery. It’s possible to file for a name change at the same time.

Upon securing a Court Order of Name Change, the person can apply to update the legal name and gender marker in social security records, passport and birth certificate.

Arkansas does not ban excluding transgender healthcare from insurance coverage, and it doesn’t provide transgender-inclusive health benefits to state employees.

The Education Department of Arkansas declared in 2016 that it would not investigate civil-rights complaints from transgender students who are barred from school bathrooms that match their gender identities.

State law provides protection for students against bullying, which is defined as being “reasonably free from substantial intimidation, harassment, or harm or threat of harm by another student.” The law specifically protects students from bullying based on race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, socioeconomic status, academic status, disability, gender, gender identity, physical appearance, health condition, sexual orientation and other attributes. District employees witnessing or knowing about bullying must report it to the principal. Every school principal (or designee) must promptly investigate the report and make a record of the investigation and any action taken. Retaliation against a reporting person is against the law.

State Medicaid is silent on transgender healthcare coverage and care.

The state has offers a gender neutral “x” option on drivers licenses.

Government statements and actions

Fayetteville had an antidiscrimination ordinance in force until January 2019, when the state Supreme Court ruled that it violates the state’s law prohibiting local laws that provide more protections to LGBT+ people than the state does. That is, the city’s nondiscrimination law violated state law. No court has yet ruled on that state law’s constitutionality.

Arkansas passed a Religious Freedom Restoration Act in 2015. It prohibits the government from levying a “substantial burden” on an individual’s freedom of religion, stipulating that such a “burden” must be a “compelling government interest” in the least restrictive manner possible. The state RFRA law mirrors the federal RFRA law, but Arkansas’s state Constitution does have additional language regarding religious liberty that the U.S. Constitution does not.

In 2019, a bill was filed in the State Senate that would have allowed adoption agencies to discriminate against prospective LGBT+ parents on religious grounds. It did not run in committee. A bill was filed in the state House of Representatives to allow individuals, institutions, providers, and payers of health care, would be able to refuse to be involved in any type of service to which they object to on a moral, ethical, or religious grounds, free from any type of liability, regardless of the effects on patients and employers.

Former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee claimed in spring 2019 that LGBT+ rights are the “greatest threat” to American morality.

The state’s entire congressional delegation has a zero percent equality score from HRC.