Out Leadership’s Business Climate Index for the 50 United States is an assessment of states’ performance on LGBTQ+ inclusion. It measures the impact government policies and prevalent attitudes have on the LGBTQ+ people residing in each state, quantifying the economic imperatives for inclusion and the costs of discrimination. It equips business leaders and policymakers with a clear sense of the most impactful steps states can take to make themselves more hospitable to forward-thinking, innovative, inclusive businesses.
out of a possible 100 points
Gender marker changes on state ID and drivers’ licenses are permitted by request. Gender marker changes on birth certificates require a court order issued upon proof of surgery. There are no statewide LGBT+ nondiscrimination protections and is a state law to prohibit local protections. However, some cities have employment protections and one city has protections against discrimination employment, housing and public accommodations.
The state takes no action on complaints by transgender students who are barred from using facilities that match their gender identity. There is no ban on conversion therapy in the state.
The state has a governor and senators with lengthy track records of voting against LGBT+ equality. The state has had a Religious Freedom Restoration Act since 2015.
Medicaid does not explicitly include or exclude transgender healthcare in the state. There are no LGBT+-specific hate crimes protections. HIV-positive people can be prosecuted for donating blood or having sex even if they don’t transmit the disease and didn’t know their status at the time.*
10% of transgender employees in Arkansas report being harassed in the past year due to their gender identity, and 25% report mistreatment such as being told to present in the wrong gender in order to keep a job. 26% of LGBT+ individuals in Arkansas reported food insecurity, double the rate for non-LGBT+ (13%). Up to 33% of LGBT+ individuals in Arkansas reported making less than $24,000 per year. 15% of LGBT+ individuals report unemployment in Arkansas, more than triple the rate of their non-LGBT+ peers (5%).
Download this report to learn how and why Out Leadership created the LGBTQ+ Business Climate Index for the 50 U.S. States, with important details about our methodology, including our data standards and practices. NOTE: *HIV criminalization laws are discriminatory and ineffective. These laws fail to account for advances made in treating and controlling HIV, may deter people from getting tested and seeking treatment, and can exacerbate the stigma targeting people living with HIV and LGBTQ+ people.Our Methodology
The legal and cultural situation for LGBTQ+ people varies widely across the country. This map, based on each state's total Business Climate Score, illustrates the states where LGBTQ+ people are empowered to participate more fully and openly in the economy, and the states that are lagging behind.
Our partnerships make our work possible. The first State LGBTQ+ Business Climate Index released in 2019 was funded by a grant from the Gill Foundation. The Index is based on data graciously shared by the Movement Advancement Project and the Williams Institute. Ropes & Gray is our pro bono legal partner for the CEO Business Briefs globally, and their research informs this Index. FCB partnered with us to conduct original market research into American attitudes toward LGBTQ+ workplace inclusion, informing the Regional Context section of the State CEO Briefs. America Competes supported the development of the scoring for the Risk Assessments, particularly for the Future Risk score.
Out Leadership and FCB partnered on original market research into the attitudes of American workers on LGBT+ inclusion, which fielded in 2019 and 2020. These briefs as a whole will be updated on an ongoing basis by Out Leadership because we recognize the ever-changing nature of policy on the local, state, and national level.
LGBT+ workers in the Southeast are the most likely to be out at work (54.4%), but they are also 25% more likely to feel that covering behaviors are important for workplace success. More broadly, non LGBT+ workers in this region preferred for businesses to demonstrate their support for the LGBT+ community using internal initiatives (like hiring more LGBT employees and creating more inclusive HR policies). However, this group was 57% less likely to approve of more public demonstrations of support (like withdrawing sponsorship from sporting events in less inclusive areas). LGBT+ workers in this region are 39% more likely to support inclusive businesses and 17% more likely to consider LGBT+ friendliness in making spending decisions compared to the non-LGBT workers nationwide. However, there is a perception that state leadership speaks about the LGBT+ community in a more negative way (39% more likely than nationwide), which could partially explain why LGBT+ workers in the Southeast are 19% more likely to say that they would be open to moving to a state with better LGBT+ support.
Unless otherwise noted, all comparisons for more or less likely are compared to the National results. Regional results are based off of 1,500 respondents (LGBT+ and Non-LGBT+ responses have been weighted to be age-representative for each audience in each region). National results are based off of 600 respondents representative of each audience (LGBT+ vs Non-LGBT+).
States in the Southeast region included: Alabama, Arkansas, Kentucky, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia.
Legal status of the Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual Community
Arkansas law does not offer discrimination protections based on gender identity or sexual orientation in housing, employment, public accommodation, or education. State law currently prohibits local governments from passing protections.
The capital city of Little Rock and several other cities, including Conway, Hot Springs, and North Little Rock, prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity in public employment. The city of Eureka Springs prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity in both public and private employment, housing, and public accommodations.
Arkansas voters passed Arkansas Proposed Initiative Act No. 1 in 2008 to prohibit individuals living together outside a legal marriage from adopting or providing foster care to minors. The measure was proposed primarily to prohibit same-sex couples from being adoptive or foster parents. In 2010, the law was found unconstitutional, a ruling upheld unanimously by the Arkansas Supreme Court in 2011.
The Arkansas Supreme Court in 2006 also struck down a state regulation banning LGBTQ people and households where any LGBTQ adult resided from foster parenting.
Arkansas does not have a hate crime law that attaches penalties to criminal convictions when motivated by gender identity or sexual orientation.
Arkansas has no restrictions on conversion therapy.
Arkansas considers people living with HIV to be a danger to the public when they have sex or donate blood without disclosing their status. A person living with HIV or AIDS who engages in either of these acts without knowing their status are criminally liable regardless and may be charged with a Class A felony. Neither the intent to transmit HIV nor transmission of HIV is required for prosecution. Conviction can result in a sentence of six to 30 years’ imprisonment and a fine of up to $15,000. Additionally, people convicted of engaging in sexual conduct without disclosing their status could end up being required to register as a sex offender.
All people living with HIV in Arkansas who know their HIV status must inform doctors or dentists of their HIV status before receiving treatment. Failure to meet this requirement is a Class A misdemeanor punishable by up to one year in prison, a $2,500 fine, or both.
Legal status of the Transgender Community
Gender marker changes on birth certificates require submitting an affidavit to the Circuit Court with a physician attesting to gender affirmation surgery. It’s possible to file for a name change at the same time.
Upon securing a Court Order of Name Change, the person can apply to update the legal name and gender marker in social security records, passport and birth certificate.
Arkansas does not ban excluding transgender healthcare from insurance coverage, and it doesn’t provide transgender-inclusive health benefits to state employees.
The Education Department of Arkansas declared in 2016 that it would not investigate civil-rights complaints from transgender students who are barred from school bathrooms that match their gender identities.
State law provides protection for students against bullying, which is defined as being “reasonably free from substantial intimidation, harassment, or harm or threat of harm by another student.” The law specifically protects students from bullying based on race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, socioeconomic status, academic status, disability, gender, gender identity, physical appearance, health condition, sexual orientation and other attributes. District employees witnessing or knowing about bullying must report it to the principal. Every school principal (or designee) must promptly investigate the report and make a record of the investigation and any action taken. Retaliation against a reporting person is against the law.
State Medicaid is silent on transgender healthcare coverage and care.
The state has offers a gender neutral “x” option on drivers licenses, and gender markers on licenses can be changed by simply requesting to do so.
Government statements and actions
After LGBT+ characters appeared on “Clifford, the Big Red Dog,” two state senators threatened in February 2020 to withhold funding from PBS, arguing that a public broadcaster shouldn’t be “advocating” for LGBT+ issues.
Fayetteville had an antidiscrimination ordinance in force until January 2019, when the state Supreme Court ruled that it violates the state’s law prohibiting local laws that provide more protections to LGBT+ people than the state does. That is, the city’s nondiscrimination law violated state law. No court has yet ruled on that state law’s constitutionality.
Arkansas passed a Religious Freedom Restoration Act in 2015. It prohibits the government from levying a “substantial burden” on an individual’s freedom of religion, stipulating that such a “burden” must be a “compelling government interest” in the least restrictive manner possible. The state RFRA law mirrors the federal RFRA law, but Arkansas’s state Constitution does have additional language regarding religious liberty that the U.S. Constitution does not.
In 2019, a bill was filed in the State Senate that would have allowed adoption agencies to discriminate against prospective LGBT+ parents on religious grounds. It did not run in committee. In 2017, a bill was filed and then rejected in the state House of Representatives to allow individuals, institutions, providers, and payers of health care, would be able to refuse to be involved in any type of service to which they object to on a moral, ethical, or religious grounds, free from any type of liability, regardless of the effects on patients and employers.
Former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee claimed in spring 2019 that LGBT+ rights are the “greatest threat” to American morality.
The state’s entire congressional delegation has a zero percent equality score from HRC.
For more context around these scores, and to learn more about the criteria we used to assess how state laws, actions and attitudes toward LGBTQ+ people create business and talent risks, please visit www.outleadership.com/staterisk.
Status of LGBT+ Organizing and Community
Central Arkansas Pride, including Little Rock Pride Fest, launched in 2013. Northwest Arkansas Pride, which is centered in Fayette-ville, celebrated its 15th year in 2019 and is the largest in the state. Batesville, Jonesboro, Harrison, and other areas of the state also have pride events.
Lucie’s place, the state’s only LGBT+-specific shelter for young adults, opened in 2012.
“The Pink House” in Conway, AR, which was owned by the gay couple who organized the city’s first pride parade and operated their home as a home for LGBT+ youth rejected by their family, is at risk of being lost; the owner who inherited it from the late couple can’t afford the upkeep. The local gay community has rallied around the cause.
Cultural Views of the LGBT+ Community
66% of state residents favor LGBT+ nondiscrimination laws.
46% oppose – and the same number favor – LGBT+ discrimination based on religion.